• Users Online: 193
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us ASMR Conference Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-6

Electroretinogram as an early detection of chloroquine retinal toxicity in pigmented rabbits


Biophysics and Laser Science Unit, Department of Visual Science, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt

Date of Submission11-Nov-2018
Date of Acceptance26-Feb-2019
Date of Web Publication27-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Amal Elawady Ibrahim
Research Institute of Ophthalmology, 2 Elahram Street, Giza, 12511
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jasmr.jasmr_38_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Objective Chloroquine (CQ) is a useful drug. It has less systemic hazards than many of the other medications used for immune diseases, but may cause retinopathy. The ophthalmologists do not discover the retinopathy till the appearance of bull’s eye. The aim of the work is to try to use electroretinogram (ERG) and its b/a ratio in early detection of CQ retinopathy for pigmented rabbits chronically treated with CQ.
Materials and methods Twenty adult pigmented rabbits (1.5–2 kg) were classified into four groups (five each): the first group served as control and the other three groups of rabbits were intramuscularly injected with CQ diphosphate (14 mg/kg body weight) three times/week for 50, 70, and 90 days, respectively. Each group is subjected to ERG recording, and then decapitation of animal and measurement of oxidant, antioxidant parameters, and histopathological examination in the retinal tissue were done.
Results All results show no change by the 50th day after CQ administration. All the changes appear by the 70th day. The data indicated there is a deformation in ERG waves and significant decrease (P<0.05) in b/a ratio. Significant increase (P<0.05) in malondialdehyde level, and in the same context, significant decreases (P<0.05) in superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase activity were seen. The histopathological changes are in the form of vacuolation in the pigment epithelium, destruction in the outer segments of the photoreceptor layer, and signs of karyolysis in some nuclei of outer nuclear layer.
Conclusion Our data showed the possibility of using b/a ratio as an early indicator to CQ retinal toxicity in pigmented rabbits. It is also suggested that CQ increases the oxidative stress levels, so supplementation by antioxidants should be a part of the treatment regime.

Keywords: b/a ratio, chloroquine, electroretinogram, lipid peroxidation, pigmented rabbits


How to cite this article:
Ibrahim AE, Elabrak E, Ali MA. Electroretinogram as an early detection of chloroquine retinal toxicity in pigmented rabbits. J Arab Soc Med Res 2019;14:1-6

How to cite this URL:
Ibrahim AE, Elabrak E, Ali MA. Electroretinogram as an early detection of chloroquine retinal toxicity in pigmented rabbits. J Arab Soc Med Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 17];14:1-6. Available from: http://www.new.asmr.eg.net/text.asp?2019/14/1/1/261614


  Introduction Top


Chloroquine (CQ) and its analog, hydroxychloroquine, are widely prescribed for rheumatoid arthritis, amebiasis disseminated, and lupus erythematosus. They were initially used for prophylaxis and treatment of malaria [1]. These medications may cause retinopathy with a predominant feature of advanced maculopathy. Different methods have been used to explore retinal dysfunction associated with CQ uses [2],[3],[4],[5]. It is important to stress on the fact that CQ is a useful drug and has less systemic adverse effects than many of the other medications used for immune or inflammatory diseases. In spite of the abundance of researches on the CQ retinal toxicity, a controversy persists regarding whether the toxic effects of CQ act directly on the epithelium of retinal pigment or on ganglion cells or both. As indicated by past studies, some researchers suggested that the drug could interfere with the metabolism of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and this may lead to secondary photoreceptor degeneration [6],[7],[8]. Others recommended that the ganglion cell is the major site of toxicity [9],[10],[11],[12]. The issue of CQ binding to melanin has been examined by numerous authors who suggested that the interaction of CQ with melanin may prompt retinal injury [13],[14],[15]. CQ retinopathy is irreversible, and growth of cellular damage may even increase after stopping of the drugs. When retinopathy is not known until the appearance of bull’s eye, the disease can develop for years, with a subsequent loss of visual acuity. However, once retinopathy is recognized early, before RPE damage, there is only mild and limited progress after stopping the medication [16],[17],[18]. Thus, consistent follow-up cannot prevent damage, but if conducted aptly it enables the detection of toxicity before vision is significantly affected. Therefore, a very common method to avoid series retinal injury is to make sure patients that are taking the maximum amount of CQ had a screening [19]. Literature reports suggest that drugs such as CQ and primaquine used to treat malaria lead to oxidative stress, especially in erythrocytes [20],[21], and induce lipid peroxidation in retina [22],[23]. Bhattacharyya et al. [24] demonstrated that administration of CQ increases in NADPH that induced lipid peroxidation. Katewa and Katyare [25] have shown that prolonged use of antimalarials leads to severe impairment of energy metabolism and metabolic activity and alters the composition of mitochondrial lipids/phospholipids.

Although electroretinography (ERG) has been used in many studies to assess the functional retinal status during the usage of this drug [26], it does not recognize the initial phase of the retinal damage. ERG is a sensitive method of detecting changes in retina.

Our aim in this study is to try to use ERG and its b/a ratio in early detection of CQ retinopathy for pigmented rabbits chronically treated with CQ. Moreover, malondialdehyde (MDA) level and superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and catalase (CAT) activities were measured in the retina to determine the oxidants and antioxidants parameters corresponding to retinal tissue. Finally, morphological changes in the retinal tissue were detected by histology after CQ treatment.


  Materials and methods Top


Chloroquine used and dose

CQ diphosphate was obtained from the pharmacy as sachets produced by Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, Missouri, USA). Each sachet contains 100 g. CQ diphosphate was given in a dose of 14 mg/kg and dissolved in 0.2-ml saline by intramuscular injection three times per week [7]

Animals and the study design

Twenty adult pigmented rabbits weighing between 1.5 and 2 kg were used in this study. The animals were kept in the animal house of Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt, under standard conditions of temperature and humidity (temperature: 22±2°C; humidity: 45–55%; light intensity: 300–400 lx). The animals were supplied proper pellet diet and water ad libitum. The experimental protocol was applying The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology statements for using animals in ophthalmic and vision research.

The animals were randomly divided into four groups (five each) as follows:
  • Group I: control group remained untreated.
  • Group II: received CQ diphosphate for 50 days.
  • Group III: received CQ diphosphate for 70 days.
  • Group IV: received CQ diphosphate for 90 days.


All groups of rabbits were subjected to ERG first and then decapitated. Their eyes were extracted to remove the retina for oxidants–antioxidants measurements and histology.

Recording of electroretinogram

ERG was recorded for the chinchilla rabbits in all groups using the [Neuro-ERG (Neurosoft Medical Diagnostics- Russia at the Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza-Egypt)]. ERG was recorded by using three skin electrodes: the active electrode is placed on the eyelid, and the reference and earth electrodes are placed on the two ears. To record full field ERG, frequency of 1 flash/second is used with no background intensity.

Oxidant and antioxidant measurements

At the end of the period of all groups, rabbits were decapitated and eyes were enucleated to remove the retina. Ten milligrams of homogenized retina was used for measurements of lipid peroxidation or MDA, SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT activity. MDA was measured calorimetrically in retina homogenate using assay kit of Sigma Aldrich Co. (Germany), according to the method of Dahle et al. [27]. SOD was measured by ELISA using an assay kit of Cell Biolabs Inc. (USA), according to the method of Durak et al. [28]. GSH-Px activity was measured by Cellular Activity Assay Kit of Sigma Aldrich Co. (Germany), according to method of Paglia and Valentine [29]. CAT activity was measured using assay kit of BioVision Inc. (Canada), according to the method of Aebi [30].

Histopathological examination of the retina

The eyes were enucleated, and intraocular injection of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) containing 5.4% glucose and 4% glutaraldehyde was carried out for half an hour. The cornea and lens were removed, and the posterior segment of the eye containing the retina was cut into small pieces (about 1 μ) and then further fixed for another 8 h in fresh glutaraldehyde buffered solution. Then the specimens were fixed in phosphate buffered osmium tetroxide for one hour at 4°C. They were washed for 1 h with several changes of phosphate buffer and dehydrated in cold alcohol series (50, 70, 80, 90, and 96%) for 10 min each. After dehydration, the specimens were then placed in propylene oxide for 10 min. Embedding of the retinal parts was carried out in Araldite mixture [31]. Finally, the specimens were embedded in rubber plates filled with freshly prepared araldite mixture and left at 60°C for 20 h. The blocks finally were polymerized at 70°C for 48 h. Blocks were sectioned by LKB ultra tome. Semithin sections were mounted on glass slide and stained with Toluidine blue. The slides are examined by a light microscope.

Statistical analysis

All results are recorded as mean±SD. For comparison between multiple groups, the analysis of variance procedure was used, where a commercially available software package (SPSS-11 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used, and the significance level was set at less than 0.05.


  Results Top


Electrophysiological study

An ERG of a control and treated rabbits is shown in [Figure 1]. The mean±SD of the amplitude of both a and b waves for the control and treated groups are stated in [Table 1]. For control, the amplitude and implicit time of a-wave were 26.1±0.5 µV and 13±0.26 ms, respectively, whereas those of the b-wave were 54±1.6 µV and 34±0.7 ms, respectively.
Figure 1 Typical records of ERG for rabbits before and after chloroquine administration for all periods. ERG, electroretinogram.

Click here to view
Table 1 a-wave and b-wave amplitudes (μV), their implicit time (ms), their ratio b/a, and percentage differences for treated groups compared with control

Click here to view


Amplitudes were measured from baseline to the lowest point of the negative peak for the a-wave and from the latter to the positive peak for the b-wave. The percentage difference [(control–treated)/control) %] of ERG parameters showed no changes during the first 50 days. Slight changes appeared on the 70th day and significant changes (P<0.05) on the 90th day. The changes were clear and noticeable. Significant increase (P<0.05) of implicit time and significant decrease (P<0.05) of amplitude for both a-wave and b-wave were observed. The data showed that a-wave is more affected than b-wave. It is clear from [Table 1] that the decline of a-wave is faster than b-wave. The b/a ratio is also calculated which serves as a quantitative index and an examination to the vitality of the retina. In this work, 2.31±0.05 was found for control group. The ratio for the exposed groups showed a decrease throughout the period of the experiment, as is seen in [Figure 2].
Figure 2 b/a ratio of ERG for rabbits before and after chloroquine administration for all periods. ERG, electroretinogram.

Click here to view


Oxidant and antioxidant results

The results reported in [Table 2] indicate the activities of MDA, SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT in retinal tissues. The table illustrated the control values of different measured parameters, which were 5.13±0.12 nmol/mg for MDA, 4.60±0.18 U/mg for SOD, 135.23±5 NU/mg for GSH-Px, and 4.69±0.20 U/mg for CAT activity. The results indicated no significant changes in oxidant–antioxidant parameters owing to treatment with CQ for 50 and 70 days. However, after 90 days of treatment with CQ, there were significant increases (P<0.05) in MDA value accompanying with significant decrease (P<0.05) in SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT.
Table 2 Malondialdehyde level and superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase activities in retinal tissues for control rabbits and those treated with chloroquine after 50, 70, and 90 days

Click here to view


Histopathological examination

The structure of control group and histopathological changes of retina, after administration of CQ are shown in [Figure 3]. Light microscopic examination of semithin sections for retina of control rabbit reveals normal histological appearance of the layers of retina extending from outside toward the vitreous ([Figure 3]a). These layers are arranged as follows: (a) pigment epithelium layer (PE), (b) photoreceptor (ph.), (c) outer limiting membrane (OLM), (d) outer nuclear (ONL), (e) outer plexiform (OPL), (f) inner nuclear (INL), (g) inner plexiform (IPL), (h) ganglion cells (GCL), (i) nerve fiber (NFL), and (j) inner limiting membrane (ILM).
Figure 3 Histological examination of rabbit retina for all groups. (a) Control rabbit showing the different layers of retina. PE, pigment epithelium; PhL, receptor layer; OLM, outer limiting membrane; OPL, outer plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer; NFL, nerve fiber layer; INM, inner limiting membrane (toluidine blue ×1250). (b) Group II showing no change in all layers of retina of rabbits that received chloroquine for 50 days (toluidine blue ×1250). (c) Group III (group that was administered with chloroquine for 70 days) shows there is a slight change in the photoreceptor layer of rabbit retina (toluidine blue ×500). (d) Group IV (group that received chloroquine for 90 days) showing the fragmentation and more changes appear in the photoreceptor layer (toluidine blue ×500).

Click here to view


Light microscopic examination of rabbit’s retina that received CQ for 50 days showed no histopathological changes ([Figure 3]b). There was a slight fragmentation in group III in the photoreceptor layer ([Figure 3]c), and this change increased and became obviously in group IV, which received CQ for 90 days ([Figure 3]d). The changes are in the form of vacuolation in pigment epithelium layer and distribution in the outer segments of photoreceptor layer. Moreover, some nuclei of outer nuclear layer were surrounded by a hallow clear area, whereas other showed signs of karyolysis. Edema in outer plexiform layer appeared. Some nuclei of inner nuclear layer showed signs of karyolysis after 90 days ([Figure 3]c and d).


  Discussion Top


In the current study, pigmented rabbits were preferred because of the similarity of their eye to the human eye [7]. A dose of 14 mg/kg thrice a week was given. This used dose is approximately 1.5 times that of the therapeutic dose used in the treatment of malaria disease; whereas the therapy of rheumatologic and dermatological diseases needs higher doses, which suggests rise in its risk. The current investigation showed that the ERG changes of rabbits started after 70 days and were evident within 90 days of CQ administration. The changes were in the form of statistically significant increase and decrease (P±0.05) of implicit time and amplitude, respectively, for both a-wave and b-wave. The present finding agrees with Lezmi et al. [6].

ERG represents the electrical activity generated by neural and non-neuronal cells within the retina in response to a light stimulus. The a-wave is an early corneal-negative deflection, derived from the outer photoreceptor layer, and measures its activity. The b-wave is a corneal-positive deflection, derived from the inner retina, predominantly Muller and ON-bipolar cells [32]. The a-wave amplitude depends on the reliability of the photoreceptor, whereas the amplitude of b-wave depends on the a-wave and of the interactions between the a- wave and b-wave generators [33]. Our results agree with the suggestion of CQ interaction with RPE being the cause of secondary photoreceptor degeneration, that is clear in results of a-wave and b-wave and b/a ratio. CQ has an affinity for pigmented (melanin-containing) structures. Melanin is a free-radical stabilizer and might catch toxins, including retinotoxic medication. However, melanin binding could represent a mechanism for eliminating toxic agents from intracellular sites of damage. This may explain why ERG showed no changes during the first 50 days.

In animal studies, CQ exposure damaged inner and outer retina, but recent research proposes that inner retina is not injured [34],[35], which agrees with our histopathological results ([Figure 3]c and d). In clinical practice, the first harm is to the rods and cones, and as the outer nuclear layer degenerates, there is secondary disorder of the RPE [36]. So, this clarification may give a good idea about the resulted deformation in the ERG. It is noticed in the current study that, on the 70th day mark, certain alterations were observed; the b/a ratio decreased owing to decreasing both of a-wave and b-wave amplitude, and the a-wave rapid decrease was much more noticeable (7.3–14.3%) than the b-wave (4–7.1%) as it was much faster. The previously mentioned findings were between a 20-day interval (70–90 days).

The retina which is considered as neurosensory tissues has many unsaturated fatty acids and is thus highly sensitive to oxygen-free radicals. The measurement of lipid peroxidation is a convenient method to monitor oxidative damage. The oxidative stress induced by CQ leads to extreme formation of free radicals and improved lipid peroxidation resulting in retinopthy. Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances produced by lipid peroxidation can cause cross-linking and polymerization of membrane constitutes. This can modify the natural membrane characteristics such as deformability, ion transport, and enzyme activity [37], and this is in containment with the results of oxidants–antioxidants parameters owing to treatment with CQ after 90 days.

SOD is a metalloprotein and is the first enzyme involved in the antioxidant enzyme by lowering the steady state level of O−2▪. CAT is a hemeprotein, which catalyzes the decomposition of hydroperoxide to water and oxygen and thus protects the cell from oxidative damage by hydroperoxide and OH. GSH-Px was an enzyme catalyze the reduction of hydroperoxide by glutathione [38]. In our study, decline in the activities of these enzymes in CQ-administered rabbits reveals that lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress are elicited by CQ intoxication. Lipid peroxidation in this tissue is extremely deleterious, because the ERG is produced by a series of differences in membrane ionic permeability. Correlating the previous data, it can be suggested that testing this b/a ratio could possibly alert to a problem in the retina early on, before any serious damage happens.


  Conclusion Top


Our experimental data showed the possibility of using b/a ratio as an early indicator to CQ retinal toxicity in pigmented rabbits. As the ERG was mimicked on rabbits to those described in humans, we recommend to inform patients about the risk of ocular toxicity of CQ and their proper dose levels and the importance of regular follow-up. It is also suggested that supplementation of antioxidants should be in part of treatment plan for management of the retinal toxicity of CQ.

Declaration of interest

The author reports no conflicts of interest. The author alone is responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
DeCarvalho AC, Schwarz M, Souza Gda S, Gomes BD, Rosa AA, Ventura AM et al. Multifocal electroretinography after high dose chloroquine therapy for malaria. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2013; 8:193–198.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ventura DF, Silveira LCL, Nishi M, Costa MF, Gualtieri M, Santos RMA et al. Colour vision loss in patients treated with chloroquine. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2003; 66:9–15.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tzekov RT, Serrato A, Marmor MF. ERG findings in patients using hydroxychloroquine. Doc Ophthalmol 2004; 108:87–97.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lucia TA, Marco CE, Francesco OD, Mariacristina PA, Vincenzo PA, Lucia ZI et al. Retinal functional changes measured by frequency-doubling technology in patients treated with hydroxychloroquine. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249:715–721.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Giocanti A, Couturier A, Girmens JF, Le Mer Y, Massamba N, Barreau E et al. Variability of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine retinopathy among various ethnicities. J Fr Ophtalmol 2018; 41:363–367.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lezmi S, Rokh N, Saint-Macary G, Pino M, Sallez V, Thevenard F et al. Chloroquine causes similar electroretinogram modifications, neuronal phospholipidosis and marked impairment of synaptic vesicle transport in albino and pigmented rats. Toxicology 2013; 308:50–59.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
El-Sayed NK, Abdel-Khalek LR, Gaafar KM, Hanafy LK. Profiles of serum proteins and free amino acids associated with chloroquine retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76:422–430.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nylander U. Ocular damage in chloroquine therapy. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) Suppl 1967; 92:1–71.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hasim U, Bulent G, Aydin Y, Mehmet GT, Feride AK, Hasan G et al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on the retinal layers: a quantitative evaluation with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. J Ophthalmol 2016; 2016:8643174.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sirichai P, Gerald AF, Dongseok C, Mahnaz S. Selective thinning of the perifoveal inner retina as an early sign of hydroxychloroquine retinal toxicity. Eye (Lond) 2010; 24:756–763.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kim JEM. Hydroxychloroquine toxicity. American Academy of Ophthomology. Retrieved from Eye Wiki 2014; article.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rosenthal AR, Kolb H, Bergsma D, Huxsoll D, Hopkins JL. Chloroquine retinopathy in the rhesus monkey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17:1158–1175.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Schroeder RL, Pendleton P, Gerber JP. Physical factors affecting chloroquine binding to melanin. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2015; 134:8–16.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Schroeder RL, Gerber JP. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine binding to melanin: Some Possible consequences for pathologies. Toxicol Rep 2014; 1:963–968.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mitan RG, Aswani DV, Ashim KM. Ocular toxicity from systemically administered xenobiotics. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2012; 8:1277–1291.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Marmor MF, Hu J. Effect of disease stage on progression of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132:1105–1112.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Easterbrook M. An ophthalmological view on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine versus hydroxychloroquine. J Rheumatol 1999; 26:1866–1868.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Falcon P, Paolini L, Lou PL. Hydroxychloroquine toxcicity despite normal dose therapy. Ann Ophthalmol 1993; 25:385–388.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Recommendations on screening for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine retinopathy − 2016 AAO Quality of Care Secretariat, Hoskins Center for Quality Eye Care. March 2016 ; Revised March 2016. article  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Baird JK, Hoffman SL. Primaquine therapy for malaria. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1336–1345.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Becker K, Tilley L, Vennerstrom JL, Roberts D, Rogerson S, Ginsburg H. Oxidative stress in malaria parasite-infected erythrocytes: host-parasite interactions. Int J Parasitol 2004; 34:163–189.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Ivanina TA, Sakina NL, Lebedeva MN, Borovyagin VL. A study of the mechanisms of chloroquine retinopathy,I: chloroquine effect on lipid peroxidation of retina. Ophthalmic Res 1989; 21:216–220.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Raley MJ, Schwacha MG, Loegering DJ. Lysosomotropic agents ameliorate macrophage dysfunction following the phagocytosis of IgG-coated erythrocytes: a role for lipid peroxidation. Inflammation 1997; 21:619–628.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Bhattacharyya B, Chatterjee TK, Ghosh JJ. Effects of chloroquine on lysosomal enzymes,NADPH-induced lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant enzymes of rat retina. Biochem Pharmacol 1983; 32:2965–2968.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Katewa SD, Katyare SS. Treatment with antimalarials adversely affects the oxidative energy metabolism in rat liver mitochondria. Drug Chem Toxic 2004; 27:41–53.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kellner U, Kraus H, Foerster MH. Multifocal ERG in chloroquine retinopathy: regional variance of retinal dysfunction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 238:94–97.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Dahle LK, Hill EG, Holman RT. The thiobarbituric acid reaction and the autoxidations of polyunsaturated fatty acid methyl esters. Arch Biochem Biophys 1962; 98:253–261.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Durak I, Canbolat O, Kavutçu M, Öztürk HS, Yurtarslani Z. Activities of total, cytoplasmic, and mitochondrial superoxide dismutase enzymes in sera and pleural fluids from patients with lung cancer. J Clin Lab Anal 1996; 10:17–20.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med 1967; 70:158–169.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 1984; 105:121–126.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Glauert AM. The fixation and embedding of biological specimen. In: Key DH, ed. Techniques for electron microscopy. Philadelphia: Davis Co.; 1965. 166–212.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Young B, Eric E, David K. Current electrophysiology in ophthalmology: a review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23:497–505.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Kolb H, Nelson R, Fernandez E, Jones B. (2011). Web vision. The organization of the retina and visual system. University of Utah, Utah.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Lee MG, Kim SJ, Ham DI, Kang SW, Kee C, Lee J, Cha HS, Koh EM. Macular retinal ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness in patients on hydroxychloroquine therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 56:396–402.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
De Sisternes L, Hu J, Rubin DL, Marmor MF. Localization of damage in progressive hydroxychloroquine retinopathy on and off the drug: inner versus outer retina, parafovea versus peripheral fovea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56:3415–3426.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Marmor MF. Comparison of screening procedures in hydroxychloroquine toxicity. Arch Ophthalmol 2012; 130:461–469.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Pari L, Murugan PT. etrahydrocurcumin: effect on chloroquine-mediated oxidative damage in rat kidney. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2006; 99:329–334.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Bruce A, Freeman D, James C. Biology of disease-free radicals and tissue injury. Lab Invest 1982; 47:412.  Back to cited text no. 38
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed72    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded17    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]